Monday 29 January, 2007

Time is relative

I find long periods of time quite difficult to visualise. Anything more than about six weeks, and it becomes "a long time", but without a comparator, it's difficult to give it a frame of reference.

I'm looking forward to a big event due in about 75 days' time. A little under eleven weeks. In order to picture this, I work back from today by the same amount of time and imagine a relatively memorable event that took place that many days ago. 67 days ago today, I took a trip to Newcastle on business. I can vividly remember that event, and it doesn't seem that long ago at all, and that's roughly how long I have to wait until the big event.

It would be good if I had a little app. that plucked the nearest such event from my Google Calendar to give me a comparator for any given date I'm eagerly awaiting.


Posted by dan at 8:53am | Permalink | Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0)
Sunday 28 January, 2007

Quote of Celebrity Big Brother 2007

Filed under: General

Shilpa Shetty: "This is what today’s UK is? It’s scary."

Thanks, Jo. Thanks, Jade. Thanks, Danielle. Thanks, Jackiey. What a dreadful indictment of modern Britain.


Posted by dan at 7:53am | Permalink | Comments (4) | Trackbacks (0)
Friday 26 January, 2007

Steaming crap and Paddington bare

Filed under: Life

A few shots from the last couple of days.

First, a sign embedded in the pavement on the eastern junction of Chenies Street and North Crescent, just off Tottenham Court Road.

Steaming crap

Next, a couple of shots of Paddington Station taken at 5.44am this morning, before boarding the 5.55am Heathrow Express. You rarely see it quite like this, given that over 25m people go through Paddington each year.

Paddington Station (1)

Paddington Station (2)


Posted by dan at 8:11am | Permalink | Comments (1) | Trackbacks (0)
Tuesday 23 January, 2007

New static copy on the BBC website

Filed under: Tech. stuff, Sport

I think that the BBC has introduced some new static copy on its News homepage. Just under the Sport Headlines title on the right-hand side, it reads:

Cricket: Dismal England collapse

I'm pretty sure it's static. I think it's been there ever since the Australia tour began on 10 November. I can't imagine there's a need for it to be content manageable.


Posted by dan at 1:38am | Permalink | Comments (1) | Trackbacks (0)
Monday 22 January, 2007

Inconsistent user experience

I'm annoyed. Very annoyed. Here's why.

In Internet Explorer 6, CTRL + central mouse wheel used to change the font size. It used to drag the fonts from smallest to smaller to medium to large to largest. As far as I can recollect, wheel towards you increased the font sizes; wheel away from you reduced them.

In IE7, two changes have occurred:

  • Instead of changing the font sizes, CTRL + central mouse wheel now zooms in and out of the page
  • The scroll wheel has reversed its behaviour. Towards you now makes things smaller

The first of these issues doesn't seem to take into account stylesheets particularly well. For the BBC News website, things look fine. For this site, the different components drift towards or away from one another, as you zoom out and zoom in respectively.

The latter is annoying not because of its inconsistency with IE6, but because of that with Firefox 2.0.

Now I'm not saying Microsoft is wrong. There are certainly arguments for zoom rather than font scaling from an accessibility perspective. And as for the zoom direction, you could argue that either Mozilla or Microsoft is right:

  • Mozilla: dragging the wheel towards you brings the content closer
  • Microsoft: dragging the wheel up has a notion of increasing things

My issue is with the inconsistency this causes in people's user experiences. While Microsoft may have had some logical explanation for changing the behaviour of the scroll-wheel, the fact that people had got used to its old behaviour meant that (in my view) it was too deep-rooted to change.

So, now we have two products, both of which I use to do the same thing (in different contexts—sometimes things don't work properly in Firefox, and other times I want to do a spot of IE testing), the two of which react in diametrically opposite ways when I perform the same function.

I'm annoyed


Posted by dan at 7:13am | Permalink | Comments (8) | Trackbacks (0)
Friday 19 January, 2007

Where grammar and geekery collide

Filed under: Tech. stuff, Grammar etc.

It seems that these two 'qualities' are mutually exclusive: a healthy understanding of grammar and an above average appetite for all things technical.

While I've already referred to the sliding standards of people at large, it seems this trend is particularly prevalent among techies.

To prove this point, simply scroll down the titles and short summaries of articles on digg, and cringe away. Inconsistent mixed-casing, heinous apostrophe crimes and overall grammatical disappointment abound. It's not as if they have to write long essays; digg summaries are really short.

I'm not sure whether it's an education issue or one of attention to detail. Either way, it's distressing, and one of the reasons you rarely get well-rounded techies.


Posted by dan at 1:49am | Permalink | Comments (1) | Trackbacks (0)
Thursday 18 January, 2007

DotP t-shirt

Filed under: Tech. stuff

Today I'm wearing my DotP t-shirt, under the assumption that it will be replaced as the platform for Directgov this weekend. Fingers crossed.

It will still exist, supporting DH, for the time being. But I don't think it will reach its fourth birthday, which is 94 days away.

For the record, you'll be pleased to know that the t-shirt is covered with a jumper.


Posted by dan at 9:14pm | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)

More intelligent handwriting font systems

Filed under: Tech. stuff, Good ideas?

I came across this site recently via digg. It's a collection of handwriting fonts that can be downloaded directly from the page. Some of them are quite neat, but it reminded me of a problem with these fonts, and a possible solution.

The very nature of handwriting (mine in particular) is that we rarely write a particular letter the same way twice. Furthermore, the letters that we form are often dependent on the preceding letter. In the word letter, for instance, the first e is affected by it appearing after an l, the t is affected by the preceding e and so on. As far as I'm aware, these two characteristics are never addressed in fonts, as each character is treated as an independent entity, and every instance of a particular letter is technically equal.

I'm proposing a twofold solution:

  • Firstly, introduce a character-set of 676 letter characters. These represent a different form of each character when preceded by each of the letters of the alphabet. So there will be 26 lowercase As: one for aa, one for ba, one for ca etc. The same goes for Bs, Cs etc.
  • Secondly, introduce, say, five or so subtly different versions of each letter

For the former, the character would only be displayed to its half-way point. The latter half of a character would be displayed as part of the next character. So you'd also need 26 space characters (one to succeed each letter) and 26 of each punctuation mark.

It would be a complex font system (the two requirements requiring upwards of 3,500 characters), but it would much closer mimic real handwriting than do the current offerings, which limit themselves to work within our current understanding of character sets.

It's interesting how the Luna Bar font on the page linked to above uses horizontal overlaps between the characters. Maybe there is something there that could be used.

Thoughts?


Posted by dan at 8:51am | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)

Self-referential formula

Filed under: Numbers and stuff

Thanks to Francis for pointing to this ridiculous stroke of luck/ridiculously contrived inequality.

In the 1,802-byte range where 0 <= x <= 105 and some ridiculously high 17-integer range for y, the formula plots itself. Absolutely phenomenal.

The formula:

1/2 < [mod([y/17]*2^(-17[x]-mod([y],17)),2)]


Posted by dan at 8:38am | Permalink | Comments (1) | Trackbacks (0)
Tuesday 16 January, 2007

Big Brother

Filed under: General

Steve has accurately summed up the Goody family in his recent post, Sterilise the Goodys for the future of mankind. However, I feel that he's missed out on fully evaluating the full extent of the backwardness of the Celebrity Big Brother housemates, in two notable omissions:

  • Jo O'Meara
  • Danielle Lloyd

The two of them are vindictive racists. They are horrible people. Their respective bungs for going into the house should be withheld when they leave, and their careers should fall into nothingness.


Posted by dan at 7:52am | Permalink | Comments (8) | Trackbacks (0)

Google's growing chaos

I'm confused. Google has a lot of products nowadays. A non-exhaustive list of its biggest ones would include Search (along with its various nuances—Image Search, Blog Search, Book Search etc.), Mail, Maps, News, Froogle, Calendar, Documents & Spreadsheets, Photos (Picasa), Groups, Reader, Video and that's by no means comprehensive.

Some of them are marketed on the various country homepages (Google US, Google UK etc.) just above the search bar. And some stuff is surfaced on top of some of its personalised services. But it's not consistent. Here's how it looks.

  • Google US: Images, Video, News, Maps
  • Google UK: Images, Groups, News, Froogle
  • Google Mail: Search, Calendar, Photos, Docs & Spreadsheets, Groups
  • Google Calendar: Search, Mail
  • Google Reader: nothing
  • Google Photos: nothing
  • Froogle UK: Search, Images, Groups, News
  • News UK: Search, Images, Groups, Froogle

There just doesn't seem to be a consistent aproach to this. Overall, it's a mess. Google has got away with a shoddy user-experience for too long. It's time to rationalise.


Posted by dan at 6:32am | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
Sunday 14 January, 2007

Best death scenes ever

Filed under: General

I'm currently watching Final Destination 2 on Channel 4. It is a mediocre movie. But it has some phenomenally good death scenes, some notable ones (by no means all of them) detailed below.

  • Guy falls off an American-style fire escape and is lying face up on the ground. The ladder sheers off its hinges and skewers his face
  • Log falls off truck and skewers a car from front to back, along with the occupying police officer
  • Guy gets cut into three (horizontally) by a wire fence flying through the air due to an explosion. The three body bits slide off each other to the ground
  • Girl almost dies in a car crash when a pole pierces the back window and ends up through her headrest. Her momentum means that she's OK. When the fireman tries to cut her out, the airbag goes off, forcing her head back on to the pole. Another skewering
  • A guy's head gets chopped off by some elevator doors
  • A guy exploding (last scene of the film)

Genius.


Posted by dan at 9:24am | Permalink | Comments (3) | Trackbacks (0)

The darts final

Filed under: Sport

I've not watched any of this year's darts for a bunch of reasons. But I did catch the last half of the final, which I was surprised about, tuning into a match at 6–0, first to seven.

Martin Adams had won the first six sets before the interval. He and a seemingly dejected Phil Nixon walked out for what looked like a formality.

One by one, Nixon clawed his way back into the match. After winning the seventh, and even the eighth, you didn't think much of it. When he got to 6–4, alarm bells started ringing, both for Mr. and Mrs. Adams, the latter leaving the arena as the pressure became too much. Her husband had no such option.

And Nixon continued his remarkable comeback, taking sets eleven and twelve, tying the match at 6–6 to set up a final, deciding set.

Unfortunately, Nixon crumbled, wayward darts spattering the 5 and 1 beds to allow Adams to hold his nerve for a double-top finish. 7–6 to Adams.

Fantastic TV.


Posted by dan at 6:34am | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
Saturday 13 January, 2007

Great high-res. picture of Manhattan

Filed under: General

A great, very high-res. shot of Manhattan from Jersey City, showing our old home, where I used to work and the venue for weekly Sunday-night football.

Worth a look.


Posted by dan at 10:20pm | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)

The futility of the cricket

Filed under: Sport

My wife keeps seeing the results from England's 20Twenty matches against Australia on the news. This after our 5–0 drubbing in the Test.

Each time, she implores them (via the interactive medium of shouting at the TV) to "just come home", given the futile plight that they are engaged in.

I have to say that I agree. They should really have come home for Christmas to save some despair and eat some turkey


Posted by dan at 8:05am | Permalink | Comments (3) | Trackbacks (0)
Friday 12 January, 2007

Email merge?

Filed under: Tech. stuff, Good ideas?

I've often thought it would be useful to have an email merge facility in Outlook, similar to Mail Merge in Word. And I've often looked for this feature, to no avail.

But finally I've found it. Instead of being in Outlook, where you might expect it, it's hidden within the Mail Merge feature of Word. Strikes me as bizarre, but there you go!


Posted by dan at 8:39am | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)

Worst moments in songs

Filed under: Music

I don't think we've had this one. But possibly the worst moment in any song is Paul McCartney's vocal noodling in Hey Jude.

Any other contenders?


Posted by dan at 8:37am | Permalink | Comments (8) | Trackbacks (0)
Thursday 11 January, 2007

Quote of the night

Filed under: General

Quote of the night's TV, from Keith Allen's Tourette de France:

"You don't have to have Tourette's in a Little Chef to stand up and shout out 'This f*cking food is f*cking shit'".

Genius!


Posted by dan at 8:22am | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
Wednesday 10 January, 2007

At last: a reduction in .gov.uk sites

Filed under: Tech. stuff, Politics

The report by Sir David Varney last month prescribed a reduction in the number of departmental websites, instead using Directgov and Businesslink as the primary information and transactional channels for citizens and businesses respectively.

Finally!

And it seems the report has developed an impetus, the BBC today reporting the Cabinet Office's decision to close down 551 sites, with "hundreds more ... expected to follow". They estimate the total number of sites currently out there at 991, although this seems woefully low, especially if you bring in local government.

This makes me happy because (a) the government web-presence is currently chaotic and (b) I project managed the implementation of Directgov. So it's nice to see its ever-increasing profile. However this news has been a long time coming.



Posted by dan at 3:34am | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
Tuesday 9 January, 2007

The new iPhone

The iPhone has just been unveiled at Macworld in San Francisco. According to Steve Jobs its screen is 3.5" across its diagonal (with a resolution of 160 pixels per inch), and it's only 11.6mm deep. Funny how he mixes his imperial and metric lengths.

He could have gone for 88.9mm across (with 6.3 pixels per mm), or else gone for 0.45" depth.

Incidentally, the iPhone itself looks sweet.

Update: Nasa's going metric, as of today, for moon activity.

Further update: more detail on the iPhone. The phone itself is fricking unbelievable. I love it. The interface is poetry, and 95% of the functionality is beautiful, both in its simplicity and its offering.

The iPod part of the phone has advanced in leaps and bounds. Most of these advances relate to the fact that the whole thing is running OS(X), but I also love its "accelerometer", which is essentially a gravity-detector, orienting your screen according to the way you hold it. That's particularly neat, although I have no idea why they chose that name.

The traditional phone bit is also great. They've taken all of the annoyances with regular phones, and simply addressed them all—switching between calls, accessing contacts and a particularly snazzy visual voicemail, allowing you to listen to specific voicemails rather than trawl through a plethora to listen to the one that you want.

However, there is one area that is dreadful, but which is a symptom of keyless devices: typing. SMS texting and writing emails is cumbersome to say the least. Jobs says "I've got this little keyboard which is phenomenal. [...] It's actually really fast to type on".

He's lying. It took a long time for him to type a one-line text message, which was no doubt rehearsed many times over. With traditional mobile phones, there used to be a comfort factor. The feedback that the keys gave me (a little click with a tangible pressed/released state) confirmed that my press had been recognised, and I could move on to the next letter. Intelligent texting allowed 90% of the QWERTY user experience, without needing the space for all those keys. (When I typed QWERTY just then, I actually touch-typed it, instead of swiping my finger across the top row. Weird.)

My current phone (T-Mobile's MDA) has a slide-out keyboard, which offers similar, vital feedback, although the QWERTY keyboard is a little cumbersome for the two thumbs that remain free (hooray for opposable thumbs!) while my fingers cradle the unit.

The touch-screen for typing doesn't work for me—nor, it seems for Steve, who undeniably had trouble. (This in spite of the whoopings of the notoriously "Apple did it so it must be good" crowd.) It's not as if it's the lack of SMS take-up in the US that has driven the weakness, as the "keyboard" is similarly important for web browsing and email, fundamental offerings of the iPhone, what with its Google and Yahoo! partnerships.

Lastly, Apple's introduction of Safari onto the phone doesn't work too well for me either. It displays the full webpage as it would appear on my 15.4" laptop monitor. It's illegible, but you can zoom in easily. But how do I know what to zoom into? I don't. But I can zip around the screen to try and find what I'm looking for, as long as I know where to zip. I'd prefer a linear view on such a relatively small screen. The whole idea of graceful degradation and the beauty of stylesheets goes out of the window.

But neat nonetheless...


Posted by dan at 7:13am | Permalink | Comments (4) | Trackbacks (0)

Main courses: served with two asides

Filed under: General, Random thoughts

This is the offering on the menu of Bodean's, "London's Original Barbecue Smoke House" in Clapham. I've ordered chips and coleslaw with the ribs, but I'm currently sat anticipating a couple of anecdotes from the barman while waiting for the food.


Posted by dan at 4:43am | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
Monday 8 January, 2007

Ken Dodd's still alive

Filed under: General, Random thoughts

I found this out today. His name came up in conversation, but I've forgotten in what context.

Anyway, I was surprised to hear that Ken Dodd is indeed still alive. Well, apparently he is. Not sure why, but I'd assumed he was dead. I particularly enjoyed this excerpt from his Wikipedia entry.

Kenneth Arthur Dodd OBE (born 8 November 1927, in Knotty Ash, Liverpool) is a veteran English comedian and singer, famous for selling over 100 million records, his buck teeth, frizzy hair, feather duster (or "tickling stick"), and his catchphrases, often playing on the 'tickled' motif, e.g. "How tickled I am!".


Posted by dan at 3:03am | Permalink | Comments (7) | Trackbacks (0)
Sunday 7 January, 2007

Purchase of the year, 2007

Filed under: Tech. stuff, Music

It's early days, what with it being the 8th day of the calendar year. But we already have a contender for purchase of the year.

On Friday, I bought a "line-out to RCA cable". Basically, it goes from my iPod cradle to the back of my amplifier to provide me with uninterrupted music while cooking.

I've thought about buying one for a while, particularly since my FM transmitter no longer fits my upgraded iPod. But I've just never got around to it. £3.99 well spent.

Credit to Gavin (who doesn't have a blog and therefore cannot be linked to) for pointing out the correct cable to buy.


Posted by dan at 7:13pm | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
Wednesday 3 January, 2007

'H' from Steps is gay

Filed under: Music

I am absulutely dumbfounded that Ian 'H' Watkins from Steps came out yesterday before going into the Celebrity Big Brother house. I thought this had happened years ago.


Posted by dan at 5:55pm | Permalink | Comments (4) | Trackbacks (0)

Snap link previews

A while ago, Elise pointed me to Snap, a neat little application that generates previews of links when you hover over them.

I've finally got around to looking at it, having seen the app. installed on a few websites that I've stumbled upon lately. I decided to give it a try here.

I quite like it, although for some reason the bubble doesn't quite pop out of the link itself. It's offset to the right a little. Probably something to do with the stylesheets.

Let me know whether you like it or not (by commenting). I'd be interested in your feedback. I'll take it off if you don't like it.


Posted by dan at 7:37am | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)
Tuesday 2 January, 2007

Perfect pitch for This Life

Filed under: Music

I don't have perfect pitch. I have relative pitch. That means that if you give me an A, I can sing you an F (for instance), but if you ask me to sing an F without prompting, I might give it a go, but would have no idea whether I was right.

For some reason, however, I can sing the first note of the This LIfe theme without a prompt. Slightly odd. I don't know what note that is (I'd guess F#), but I can sing it.


Posted by dan at 9:09am | Permalink | Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0)

F*ck: I've been tagged!

Filed under: General

So, my friend Francis decided that it would be a good idea to blog-tag me. Basically, this seems to be the modern-day equivalent of chain letters. My duty is to tell you five little-known facts about myself, and then pass on the baton to five other unsuspecting wannabes. Here goes.

  1. I used to know how many steps there were in every single flight of stairs in my school. It was a damned big school. I knew lots of stairs; and lots of numbers
  2. I can ride across the width of London's Chinatown on a seven-foot-high unicycle having drunk five pints of Oranjeboom lager. This was proven about six years ago when the lady who is now my wife accosted a street-performed and convinced him of my unicycling abilities
  3. I once presented details of a Spectator readership survey to Boris Johnson. He was a nice enough chap, but didn't believe many of my findings
  4. All being well, I will become a dad in April. I'm absolutely giddy about this
  5. Last week I was e-introduced to Kim Cameron, one of the fellow "victims" that Francis chose. It was courtesy of a friend completely unrelated to Francis. I was planning on emailing him tomorrow. Very strange.

I don't know that many bloggers. However for the next leg, I'm choosing (in alphabetical order) Alan, Anna, Rob, Rob and Rob(in).


Posted by dan at 8:22am | Permalink | Comments (5) | Trackbacks (0)
Monday 1 January, 2007

2006

Filed under: Music

2006 saw a total of 413 posts, an average of 1.13 per day, or 34.4 per month. 2005's equivalent numbers were 224, 0.61 and 18.7 respectively.

During 204,647 visits, 796,922 pages were loaded (an average of 3.9 pages per visit) accounting for 18.4Gb of tat.

The queries Brooklyn Beckham and Beckham generated the most traffic (3,902 and 2,914 referrals respectively, presumably due to some spam doobery). The highest-placed proper queries were:

  • strongest man (337)
  • nfl (150)
  • brian harvey (64)
  • karl pilkington diary (62)
  • happy birthday corn on the cob (58)
  • orlando serrell (50)
  • ipod pros (21)
  • sumproductif (21)
  • deal or no deal formula (19)
  • christopher john francis boone (11)

Posted by dan at 7:29am | Permalink | Comments (1) | Trackbacks (0)

A wonderful pi fact

Filed under: Numbers and stuff

If you wanted to calculate the circumference of the known universe to the accuracy equal to the size a proton, you'd only need the first 50 decimal places of pi.

I know the first 20. Just need another 30, then I reckon the benefits are minimal.


Posted by dan at 7:20am | Permalink | Comments (0) | Trackbacks (0)

How many snowflake patterns are there?

Filed under: Numbers and stuff

Someone has commented on my previous post asking whether there is a limit to the number of patterns that can be formed in a snowflake. They have named themselves Jack Frost, although I question the veracity of this.

I always struggled with the idea that was promoted at school, suggesting that no two snowflakes are alike. No one ever offered a proof, so I questioned its truth.

If indeed the proposition is true, then the answer to Jack's question is infinite. Assuming snow keeps falling, and that its rate of descent doesn't slow over time, then the number of flakes that have ever existed will continue to rise, and will not tend to any limit. Under the assumption that each one is different, then the number of different snowflakes will continue unabated towards infinity (and beyond).

I prefer a somewhat simpler scenario. Let's assume that snowflakes are a certain size, and within this volume, each space is filled either with ice or air, and this is what makes snowflakes so different from one another.

I'm imagining a three-dimensional version of a black-and-white favicon, a cube. For the sake of argument, let's assume that it's 16 "pixels" wide, high and deep. So in total, there are 4,096 positions, each of which can take a value of "ice" or "air". That would make about 10^1232 possible snowflakes (10 followed by 1,231 zeros).

Now this would be kerbed somewhat by the fact that I assume all ice particles need to be connected to one another, but even at such a small scale (16x16), the numbers are astronomical. Add in the fact that snowflakes can come in a variety of sizes, and that the 16 could be increased hugely, then there's lots of possibilities.

There's my attempt at solving the problem. Any advance? Anyone? Bueller? Anyone?


Posted by dan at 6:13am | Permalink | Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0)